Olympus E-5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
58 Imaging
48 Features
76 Overall
59
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Here is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-5 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-5 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very comparable but the E-5 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") have different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-5 was manufactured 22 months before the XZ-2 iHS making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-5 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-5 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-5 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-5 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-5
XZ-2 iHS | E-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | February 2011 | Fresher by 22 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-5 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Display resolution | 920k | 920k | Exact same display resolution |
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-5 offers physical measurements of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") and a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
See the Olympus E-5 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-5 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-5 and XZ-2 iHS is 58 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing specifications. The visual below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-5 and XZ-2 iHS.
To sum up, each of these cameras have the same resolution but different sensor sizing. The E-5 includes the larger sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler. The older E-5 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-5 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-02-03 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 35 |
Cross type focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 800 grams (1.76 pounds) | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 519 | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photographs | 340 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLM-5 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Launch pricing | $1,700 | $450 |