Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS25
58 Imaging
47 Features
76 Overall
58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6a95/f6a95b31097a048af622a4616c3ead1c1f5af58e" alt="Olympus E-5 front Olympus E-5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47619/47619e6b1ac91a51a7449bd9802860c5373c0a46" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
Following is a complete overview of the Olympus E-5 and Panasonic FS25, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-5 (12MP) and the FS25 (12MP) is fairly close but the E-5 (Four Thirds) and FS25 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-5 was introduced 2 years after the FS25 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FS25 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-5 grades vs the FS25 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-5 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-5 Gallery & Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Panasonic FS25
E-5 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 25 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus E-5
FS25 | E-5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Panasonic FS25
E-5 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-5 has got external dimensions of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS25 has proportions of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-5 and Panasonic FS25 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-5 vs the FS25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af632/af6324aa4f8ef4241f31d5dcb57f52d00d8be81a" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-5 and FS25 is 58 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83bab/83bab1002a140f393c82dd4aca3066898bd7c030" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through specs. The image underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-5 and FS25.
All in all, both cameras come with the identical megapixels but different sensor sizes. The E-5 comes with the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult. The younger E-5 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2565/a2565cc6bc5e97f786e2137a4b30c45c48ede7ae" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f55c4/f55c43f6e6bf22c95f1add2fc3dcfe65c2c2ca99" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-02-03 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 5.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 800 gr (1.76 lb) | 148 gr (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 519 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLM-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $230 |