Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42
58 Imaging
47 Features
76 Overall
58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6a95/f6a95b31097a048af622a4616c3ead1c1f5af58e" alt="Olympus E-5 front Olympus E-5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Announced February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Bump to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-5 (12MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the E-5 (Four Thirds) and FS42 (1/2.5") provide totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-5 was introduced 22 months after the FS42 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-5 grades vs the FS42 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-5 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-5 Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Panasonic FS42
E-5 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2011 | ![]() | April 2009 | Newer by 22 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus E-5
FS42 | E-5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Panasonic FS42
E-5 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-5 offers outside measurements of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") and a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS42 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
See the Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-5 and the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4202f/4202f721677d31b2e06d5bfbd16022a5c0c223af" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-5 and FS42 is 58 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67200/672008749d2f692d6606a0923689fc5e4d66f4da" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specifications. The image here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-5 and FS42.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-5 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-5 will produce extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-5 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26199/26199252f5df97973fc601cc77e538ff9dd661ad" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27d27/27d276c53955ff7e77ec999b2393eed21bd27775" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2011-02-03 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1000 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 6.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 800 grams (1.76 pounds) | 132 grams (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 519 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLM-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $580 |