Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic SZ3
58 Imaging
47 Features
76 Overall
58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6a95/f6a95b31097a048af622a4616c3ead1c1f5af58e" alt="Olympus E-5 front Olympus E-5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85a33/85a33a9c422aa8408eb0f74a734c2897c9eab6d2" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3 front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
29 Overall
35
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic SZ3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Announced February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic SZ3 Overview
Here is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-5 versus Panasonic SZ3, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-5 (12MP) and SZ3 (16MP) and the E-5 (Four Thirds) and SZ3 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-5 was released 23 months earlier than the SZ3 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic SZ3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-5 grades vs the SZ3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic SZ3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-5 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-5 Gallery & Panasonic SZ3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Panasonic SZ3
E-5 | SZ3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ3 over the Olympus E-5
SZ3 | E-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2011 | Fresher by 23 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Panasonic SZ3
E-5 | SZ3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic SZ3 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-5 has got outside dimensions of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic SZ3 has measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-5 versus Panasonic SZ3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-5 against the SZ3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aced4/aced4ac415ae8c183697d10b4e149a4648512c35" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic SZ3 size comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic SZ3 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-5 and SZ3 is 58 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a78c/2a78c770f0c25881ecd1745ca054e2cb1d48f07e" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic SZ3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic SZ3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic SZ3 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading specifications. The graphic below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-5 and SZ3.
Plainly, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-5 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic SZ3 will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-5 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6f4a/a6f4a96a8ccd76ac15cfb65c822c6ce274b6e0d0" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic SZ3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic SZ3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic SZ3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2567/e2567f4cda4a5c97d32f165523518a4b1c8dc642" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic SZ3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic SZ3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic SZ3 Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-02-03 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 23 |
Cross focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 4.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 800 gr (1.76 pounds) | 126 gr (0.28 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 95 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 519 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photographs | 250 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLM-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $150 |