Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZR3
58 Imaging
47 Features
76 Overall
58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6a95/f6a95b31097a048af622a4616c3ead1c1f5af58e" alt="Olympus E-5 front Olympus E-5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34c67/34c6734883b80a006f99e64c346b19b37961391d" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Released February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-ZX3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Olympus E-5 and Panasonic ZR3, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-5 (12MP) and the ZR3 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the E-5 (Four Thirds) and ZR3 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-5 was brought out 13 months after the ZR3 making them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZR3 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-5 grades vs the ZR3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-5 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-5 Gallery and Panasonic ZR3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Panasonic ZR3
E-5 | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 13 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Olympus E-5
ZR3 | E-5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Panasonic ZR3
E-5 | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-5 comes with external measurements of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) while the Panasonic ZR3 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-5 and Panasonic ZR3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-5 against the ZR3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf1f8/cf1f8d7c51a46f0a18c96ff98cc6e997ad6e06f2" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZR3 size comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZR3 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-5 and ZR3 is 58 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50e2b/50e2badd4af95e6a9408f85e67dd19090c279af6" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZR3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZR3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking specifications. The pic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-5 and ZR3.
To sum up, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-5 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic ZR3 will give extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The younger E-5 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cd55/8cd55a51197bcab5b036e9dc21c00130a4625485" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZR3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZR3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c4c0/6c4c09ce2ed3c7371925bc3cb0bcd40b2f4eab89" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-ZX3 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-02-03 | 2010-01-26 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V+ | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 5.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 800 gr (1.76 pounds) | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 519 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLM-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Price at launch | $1,700 | $280 |