Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS20
58 Imaging
47 Features
76 Overall
58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6a95/f6a95b31097a048af622a4616c3ead1c1f5af58e" alt="Olympus E-5 front Olympus E-5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df674/df674a6e94eb3695328fc723a66eb40972f73c7b" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
46 Overall
40
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Launched February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 206g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Launched April 2012
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ30
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS15
- Successor is Panasonic ZS25
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS20 Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Olympus E-5 and Panasonic ZS20, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-5 (12MP) and the ZS20 (14MP) is very similar but the E-5 (Four Thirds) and ZS20 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-5 was released 14 months prior to the ZS20 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS20 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-5 matches up against the ZS20 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS20 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-5 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-5 Gallery and Panasonic ZS20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Panasonic ZS20
E-5 | ZS20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS20 over the Olympus E-5
ZS20 | E-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2012 | ![]() | February 2011 | Fresher by 14 months |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Panasonic ZS20
E-5 | ZS20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS20 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-5 has got outer dimensions of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS20 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-5 and Panasonic ZS20 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-5 and the ZS20.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e3d6/3e3d64d0d0df6cd4bbe94d60697b8d5cb01ba998" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS20 size comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS20 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-5 and ZS20 is 58 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00bfa/00bfaa1642d2b7de36da2126b3c1849f55e573a9" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS20 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS20 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS20 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading a spec sheet. The visual here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-5 and ZS20.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-5 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS20 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older E-5 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/faee2/faee230124f6f5f6e2a2cb718d91637cb5f0cecb" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS20 sensor size comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS20 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS20 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/891fe/891febd9f0691bda4f6568eced70b67fc0840db3" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS20 Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ30 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-02-03 | 2012-04-26 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 23 |
Cross focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 6.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 800 grams (1.76 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 519 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photos | 260 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLM-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $349 |