Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS35
58 Imaging
48 Features
76 Overall
59
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Announced February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Released January 2014
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS30
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS40
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS35, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the E-5 (12MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-5 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-5 was introduced 3 years earlier than the ZS35 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-5 grades versus the ZS35 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-5 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-5 Gallery and Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Panasonic ZS35
E-5 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-5
ZS35 | E-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | February 2011 | More modern by 35 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Panasonic ZS35
E-5 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-5 comes with exterior measurements of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has sizing of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS35 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-5 versus the ZS35.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-5 and ZS35 is 58 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by checking out specs. The pic below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-5 and ZS35.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-5 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZS35 will produce greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged E-5 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-02-03 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 21 |
Cross type focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 800 grams (1.76 pounds) | 305 grams (0.67 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 519 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLM-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Two | One |
Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $300 |