Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
58 Imaging
48 Features
76 Overall
59
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2011
Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-5 (12MP) and the WG-1 GPS (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-5 (Four Thirds) and WG-1 GPS (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-5 was manufactured 6 months before the WG-1 GPS so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax WG-1 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-5 grades against the WG-1 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-5 and Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-5 Gallery and Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-5 | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Olympus E-5
WG-1 GPS | E-5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-5 | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2011 | August 2011 | Same generation | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-5 enjoys physical dimensions of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") and a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) while the Pentax WG-1 GPS has sizing of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the E-5 vs the WG-1 GPS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-5 and WG-1 GPS is 58 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specifications. The picture below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-5 and WG-1 GPS.
Plainly, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-5 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Pentax WG-1 GPS will produce greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively.
Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-5 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-02-03 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Cross focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 3.90 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 800 gr (1.76 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 519 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 pictures | 260 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLM-5 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $350 |