Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR
58 Imaging
47 Features
76 Overall
58
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR II
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-5 versus Ricoh GR, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-5 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the E-5 (Four Thirds) and GR (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-5 was announced 3 years before the GR which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-5 matches up vs the GR in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-5 and Ricoh GR. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-5 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Ricoh GR
| E-5 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus E-5
| GR | E-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2013 | February 2011 | More modern by 26 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1230k | 920k | Crisper screen (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Ricoh GR
| E-5 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
| Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-5 provides outer measurements of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR has specifications of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-5 versus Ricoh GR in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-5 against the GR.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-5 and GR is 58 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The image here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-5 and GR.
As you can tell, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-5 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Ricoh GR will resolve extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged E-5 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Olympus E-5 | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus E-5 | Ricoh GR |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-02-03 | 2013-04-17 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic V+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross type focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 300 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 800 gr (1.76 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 56 | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | 519 | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 870 photos | 290 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLM-5 | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Storage slots | Dual | One |
| Cost at launch | $1,700 | $971 |