Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh WG-4
58 Imaging
47 Features
76 Overall
58


90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014

Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh WG-4, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-5 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the E-5 (Four Thirds) and WG-4 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.

The E-5 was announced 4 years before the WG-4 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-5 matches up against the WG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-5 & Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-5 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Ricoh WG-4
E-5 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus E-5
WG-4 | E-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | February 2011 | Newer by 36 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Ricoh WG-4
E-5 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-5 has external dimensions of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-5 compared to the WG-4.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-5 and WG-4 is 58 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specifications. The pic underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-5 and WG-4.
Plainly, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-5 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Ricoh WG-4 will provide greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-5 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus E-5 | Ricoh WG-4 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-02-03 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Cross focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 800 gr (1.76 lb) | 230 gr (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 519 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 pictures | 240 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLM-5 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $330 |