Olympus E-5 vs Samsung GX-10
58 Imaging
48 Features
76 Overall
59
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus E-5 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Launched February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Replacement is Samsung GX-20
Olympus E-5 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Olympus E-5 versus Samsung GX-10, both Advanced DSLR cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-5 (12MP) and the GX-10 (10MP) is pretty close but the E-5 (Four Thirds) and GX-10 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-5 was brought out 4 years after the GX-10 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Mid-size SLR).
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-5 grades vs the GX-10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-5 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-5 and Samsung GX-10. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-5 Gallery and Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Samsung GX-10
E-5 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2011 | September 2006 | More modern by 54 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 210k | Sharper screen (+710k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus E-5
GX-10 | E-5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Samsung GX-10
E-5 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-5 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-5 has got outer dimensions of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-10 has proportions of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") along with a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-5 versus Samsung GX-10 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the E-5 and the GX-10.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-5 and GX-10 is 58 and 59 respectively.
Olympus E-5 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The picture below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-5 and GX-10.
Clearly, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-5 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Olympus E-5 will render more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more recent E-5 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-5 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-5 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Samsung GX-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus E-5 | Samsung GX-10 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2011-02-03 | 2006-09-21 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 210k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 800 grams (1.76 pounds) | 793 grams (1.75 pounds) |
Dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 519 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLM-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $850 |