Olympus E-5 vs Sony A900
58 Imaging
47 Features
76 Overall
58
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Olympus E-5 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Announced February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Released October 2008
- Later Model is Sony A99
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-5 vs Sony A900 Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-5 and Sony A900, both Advanced DSLR digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-5 (12MP) and A900 (25MP) and the E-5 (Four Thirds) and A900 (Full frame) posses different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-5 was released 2 years after the A900 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Mid-size SLR).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-5 scores versus the A900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-5 vs Sony A900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-5 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-5 Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Sony A900
| E-5 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2011 | October 2008 | Newer by 28 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Olympus E-5
| A900 | E-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 922k | 920k | Sharper display (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Sony A900
| E-5 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus E-5 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-5 offers outside dimensions of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has sizing of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-5 and Sony A900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-5 compared to the A900.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-5 and A900 is 58 and 54 respectively.
Olympus E-5 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing technical specs. The image below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-5 and A900.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-5 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Sony A900 will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 13 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-5 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-5 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-5 vs Sony A900 Specifications
| Olympus E-5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2011-02-03 | 2008-10-22 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic V+ | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 25MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 6048 x 4032 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 800g (1.76 lbs) | 895g (1.97 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | 79 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 519 | 1431 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 870 shots | 880 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLM-5 | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Card slots | Two | Two |
| Retail cost | $1,700 | $2,736 |