Olympus E-5 vs Sony NEX-3N
58 Imaging
47 Features
76 Overall
58
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Olympus E-5 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Old Model is Sony NEX-F3
- Later Model is Sony a5000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-5 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-5 versus Sony NEX-3N, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-5 (12MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the E-5 (Four Thirds) and NEX-3N (APS-C) provide different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-5 was launched 3 years earlier than the NEX-3N which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-5 scores versus the NEX-3N with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-5 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-5 & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-5 Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Sony NEX-3N
| E-5 | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus E-5
| NEX-3N | E-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2013 | February 2011 | More modern by 25 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Sony NEX-3N
| E-5 | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
| Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus E-5 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-5 offers outside measurements of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has sizing of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-5 versus Sony NEX-3N in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-5 vs the NEX-3N.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-5 and NEX-3N is 58 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-5 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at specifications. The picture underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-5 and NEX-3N.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-5 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Sony NEX-3N will give greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-5 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-5 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-5 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
| Olympus E-5 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-5 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2011-02-03 | 2013-02-25 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic V+ | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Number of lenses | 45 | 121 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 800 grams (1.76 lb) | 269 grams (0.59 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | 519 | 1067 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 870 photos | 480 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLM-5 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Dual | One |
| Cost at release | $1,700 | $399 |