Olympus E-5 vs Sony NEX-3N
58 Imaging
47 Features
76 Overall
58
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Olympus E-5 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Old Model is Sony NEX-F3
- Later Model is Sony a5000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-5 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-5 versus Sony NEX-3N, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-5 (12MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the E-5 (Four Thirds) and NEX-3N (APS-C) provide different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-5 was launched 3 years earlier than the NEX-3N which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-5 scores versus the NEX-3N with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-5 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-5 & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-5 Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Sony NEX-3N
| E-5 | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus E-5
| NEX-3N | E-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2013 | February 2011 | More modern by 25 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Sony NEX-3N
| E-5 | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
| Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus E-5 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-5 offers outside measurements of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has sizing of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-5 versus Sony NEX-3N in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-5 vs the NEX-3N.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-5 and NEX-3N is 58 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-5 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at specifications. The picture underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-5 and NEX-3N.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-5 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Sony NEX-3N will give greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-5 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-5 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-5 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
| Olympus E-5 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-5 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2011-02-03 | 2013-02-25 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic V+ | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Number of lenses | 45 | 121 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 800 grams (1.76 lb) | 269 grams (0.59 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | 519 | 1067 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 870 photos | 480 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLM-5 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Dual | One |
| Cost at release | $1,700 | $399 |