Clicky

Olympus E-5 vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
58
Imaging
48
Features
76
Overall
59
Olympus E-5 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
52
Features
77
Overall
62

Olympus E-5 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
  • Introduced February 2011
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-3
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Launched March 2016
  • Earlier Model is Sony RX10 II
  • Later Model is Sony RX10 IV
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-5 vs Sony RX10 III Overview

Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-5 versus Sony RX10 III, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the E-5 (12MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the E-5 (Four Thirds) and RX10 III (1") feature totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-5 was revealed 6 years earlier than the RX10 III and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-5 matches up versus the RX10 III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Sony RX10 III

 E-5 RX10 III 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus E-5

 RX10 III E-5 
LaunchedMarch 2016February 2011More recent by 62 months
Screen resolution1229k920kSharper screen (+309k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Sony RX10 III

 E-5 RX10 III 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements
Touch screen Neither comes with Touch screen

Olympus E-5 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-5 comes with physical dimensions of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) and the Sony RX10 III has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") having a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-5 versus Sony RX10 III in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the E-5 vs the RX10 III.

Olympus E-5 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-5 and RX10 III is 58 and 53 respectively.

Olympus E-5 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-5 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The photograph here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-5 and RX10 III.

Plainly, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-5 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony RX10 III will offer extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older E-5 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-5 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-5 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-5 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-5 Portrait photography factors
Sony RX10 III Portrait photography factors
60
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
exports RAW formats
MP count low (12 megapixels)
71
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (1")
offers face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-5 as a Street photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Street photography camera
71
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
weather sealing
64
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Optical)
good sensor size (1")
saves RAW formats
environment proof
heavier than competitors in class (1,051 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-5
Sports photography with Sony RX10 III
59
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
weather sealing
has phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
MP count low (12MP)
70
great zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (1")
offers tracking focus
environment proof
better than average battery (420 shots)
lack of phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-5 as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Travel photography camera
56
weather sealing
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
lack of Time Lapse recording
MP count low (12MP)
55
better than average battery (420 CIPA)
environment proof
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
long reach (600mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors in class (1,051 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-5 Landscape photography details
Sony RX10 III Landscape photography details
65
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
weather sealing
2 card slots
MP count low (12 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse recording
63
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
good sensor size (1")
saves RAW formats
environment proof
better than average battery (420 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
missing Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-5 Vlogging highlights
Sony RX10 III Vlogging highlights
64
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detection focus
has external mic support
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
28
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
great video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
has mic port
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
screen is not selfie friendly
heavier than competitors in class (1,051 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-5 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-5 and Sony RX10 III
 Olympus E-5Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-5 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Type Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2011-02-03 2016-03-29
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic V+ Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4032 x 3024 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 6400 12800
Maximum boosted ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW images
Min boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 11 25
Cross type focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-600mm (25.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.4-4.0
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.7
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 920k dot 1,229k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology HyperCrystal transmissive LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Maximum silent shutter speed - 1/32000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 5.0 frames/s 14.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 18.00 m (at ISO 200) 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 800g (1.76 lb) 1051g (2.32 lb)
Dimensions 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 56 70
DXO Color Depth rating 21.6 23.1
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.5 12.6
DXO Low light rating 519 472
Other
Battery life 870 photos 420 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLM-5 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 2 1
Cost at launch $1,700 $1,398