Olympus E-5 vs Sony TX9
58 Imaging
47 Features
76 Overall
58
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Olympus E-5 vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Launched February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Announced July 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-5 vs Sony TX9 Overview
Following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-5 and Sony TX9, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-5 (12MP) and the TX9 (12MP) is very comparable but the E-5 (Four Thirds) and TX9 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-5 was brought out 7 months after the TX9 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-5 scores versus the TX9 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-5 vs Sony TX9 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-5 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-5 Gallery & Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Sony TX9
| E-5 | TX9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2011 | July 2010 | More modern by 7 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Olympus E-5
| TX9 | E-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 920k | Clearer display (+2k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Sony TX9
| E-5 | TX9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing |
Olympus E-5 vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-5 comes with physical dimensions of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Sony TX9 has specifications of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-5 and Sony TX9 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-5 versus the TX9.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-5 and TX9 is 58 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-5 vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through specifications. The image underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-5 and TX9.
To sum up, both the cameras have the same megapixel count but not the same sensor sizes. The E-5 includes the larger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field simpler. The more modern E-5 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-5 vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-5 vs Sony TX9 Specifications
| Olympus E-5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2011-02-03 | 2010-07-08 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic V+ | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Cross focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 3.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 800 gr (1.76 pounds) | 149 gr (0.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 519 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 870 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLM-5 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Two | One |
| Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $799 |