Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-620
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Updated by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released July 2009
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-620 Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-620, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and E-620 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
Photography GlossaryThe E-500 was announced 4 years before the E-620 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-500 scores against the E-620 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-620 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-620. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Olympus E-620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus E-620
E-500 | E-620 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus E-500
E-620 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2009 | October 2005 | Newer by 45 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-620
E-500 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-620 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 has physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Olympus E-620 has dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-620 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-500 versus the E-620.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and E-620 is 70 and 71 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-620 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specs. The picture here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and E-620.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus E-620 to result in more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-620 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus E-620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus E-620 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2009-07-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 7 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 45 | 45 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 215k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | 0.48x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Maximum video resolution | None | None |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lbs) | 500 gr (1.10 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 55 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 536 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $600 | $799 |