Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 front
Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
73
Overall
61

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Replacement is Olympus E-510
Olympus E-M10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
  • Revealed March 2014
  • Updated by Olympus E-M10 II
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 Overview

Following is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and E-M10 (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor size (Four Thirds).

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-500 was announced 9 years earlier than the E-M10 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-500 matches up vs the E-M10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus E-M10

 E-500 E-M10 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Olympus E-500

 E-M10 E-500 
RevealedMarch 2014October 2005More modern by 102 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1037k215kClearer screen (+822k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-M10

 E-500 E-M10 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 comes with exterior measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 has specifications of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-500 and the E-M10.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and E-M10 is 70 and 82 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by going through specifications. The pic here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and E-M10.

To sum up, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Olympus E-M10 to provide greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-M10 as a Portrait photography camera
49
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
does not have liveview
low MP (8MP)
71
manual focus
good MP (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography features
Olympus E-M10 Street photography features
57
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competitors (479 grams)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
77
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
features focus by touch
good high ISO (25,600)
more heavy than others (396 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography factors
Olympus E-M10 Sports photography factors
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
does not have liveview
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-500
Travel photography with Olympus E-M10
52
lighter than competitors (479g)
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
low MP (8MP)
display is not selfie friendly
67
features focus by touch
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
more heavy than others (396 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography features
Olympus E-M10 Landscape photography features
43
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inches)
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
does not have Timelapse recording
79
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging factors
Olympus E-M10 Vlogging factors
9
no video recording
33
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than others (396g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-M10
 Olympus E-500Olympus OM-D E-M10
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-500 Olympus OM-D E-M10
Alternate name EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2005-10-21 2014-03-18
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 400 25600
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 81
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 45 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 215 thousand dot 1,037 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x 0.58x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per sec 8.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.80 m (ISO100)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64)
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180s 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479g (1.06 lb) 396g (0.87 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 72
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 884
Other
Battery life - 320 pictures
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10))
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $600 $600