Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-M10 III, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both built by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-500 was released 13 years earlier than the E-M10 III and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-500 scores against the E-M10 III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-500 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus E-M10 III
E-500 | E-M10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus E-500
E-M10 III | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | October 2005 | More recent by 144 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 215k | Sharper screen (+825k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-M10 III
E-500 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 provides exterior measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 III has sizing of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
See the Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-M10 III in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-500 compared to the E-M10 III.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and E-M10 III is 70 and 80 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking technical specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and E-M10 III.
As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should count on the Olympus E-M10 III to give you more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2017-08-31 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 45 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 215k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 8.6fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 pounds) | 410g (0.90 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $600 | $650 |