Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
  • Successor is Olympus E-510
Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Introduced August 2017
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview

In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-M10 III, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both built by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (Four Thirds).

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-500 was released 13 years earlier than the E-M10 III and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-500 scores against the E-M10 III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 E-500 E-M10 III 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus E-500

 E-M10 III E-500 
IntroducedAugust 2017October 2005More recent by 144 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1040k215kSharper screen (+825k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-M10 III

 E-500 E-M10 III 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 provides exterior measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 III has sizing of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).

See the Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-M10 III in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-500 compared to the E-M10 III.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and E-M10 III is 70 and 80 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking technical specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and E-M10 III.

As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should count on the Olympus E-M10 III to give you more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography highlights
48
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no liveview feature
low resolution (8 megapixels)
73
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-M10 III as a Street photography camera
56
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
lighter than competition in class (479 grams)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
77
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
provides touch to focus
great ISO range (25,600)
heavier than others (410 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography information
Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography information
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
69
quiet mode (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
lacks phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography advice
Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography advice
52
lighter than competition in class (479 grams)
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse recording
low resolution (8MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
67
provides touch to focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
has built in flash
heavier than others (410g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography highlights
43
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Time Lapse recording
80
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging information
Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging information
9
can't shoot video
32
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect focusing
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
missing mic support
heavier than others (410 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-M10 III
 Olympus E-500Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-500 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Also referred to as EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2005-10-21 2017-08-31
Physical type Mid-size SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 400 25600
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW data
Lowest boosted ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 3 121
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 45 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 215k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x 0.62x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Maximum quiet shutter speed - 1/16000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 8.6fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.80 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution None 3840x2160
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479g (1.06 pounds) 410g (0.90 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 330 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported)
Card slots One One
Price at launch $600 $650