Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M5 III
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c365/2c36512778594cdfbf2b2301f5cdebbcaebbc0db" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front"
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M5 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Released October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Launched October 2019
- Superseded the Olympus E-M5 II
- Refreshed by OM System OM-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M5 III Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus E-M5 III, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless and they are both built by Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and E-M5 III (20MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-500 was manufactured 15 years before the E-M5 III and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-500 matches up against the E-M5 III for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M5 III Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 & Olympus OM-D E-M5 III. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Olympus E-M5 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus E-M5 III
E-500 | E-M5 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus E-500
E-M5 III | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2019 | ![]() | October 2005 | Fresher by 170 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+825k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-M5 III
E-500 | E-M5 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M5 III Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has got outside measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M5 III has proportions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus E-M5 III in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-500 against the E-M5 III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d225d/d225de6b2f3d2a41ea9bdddafaff4d8ad355c4b4" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M5 III size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M5 III size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and E-M5 III is 70 and 80 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a94f/4a94f3ee5f823cf831b750b0592983325573a1be" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M5 III top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M5 III top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M5 III Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through specs. The photograph underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and E-M5 III.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus E-M5 III to show greater detail due to its extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The older E-500 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/437b9/437b9e5cda36416a4135d248d9f5990670514d70" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M5 III sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M5 III sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M5 III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ed29/1ed29209fcbe4ad89e7926b7123e91e45ae5b642" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M5 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M5 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M5 III Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2005-10-21 | 2019-10-17 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 215 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 30.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 pounds) | 414g (0.91 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 310 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $600 | $1,199 |