Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Launched October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Newer Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-PM1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus E-PM2, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are produced by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-500 was announced 8 years before the E-PM2 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-500 scores vs the E-PM2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 and Olympus PEN E-PM2. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus E-PM2
E-500 | E-PM2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus E-500
E-PM2 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2013 | ![]() | October 2005 | More recent by 92 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+245k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-PM2
E-500 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 features external measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM2 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus E-PM2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-500 against the E-PM2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fc23/2fc232eb26a6be85da9bb00f75da0ad48c89718d" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and E-PM2 is 70 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb7c9/eb7c99cbd95fed7c4c69899ddfb515cf2d66db22" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and E-PM2.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus E-PM2 to deliver more detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bbc3/0bbc35ed1cafbdfde7481cc032208b0cd9943f47" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99c10/99c1002b704d58db1a8d871b4b3a5574dbdfd0f1" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2005-10-21 | 2013-05-21 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 215k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 lbs) | 269g (0.59 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $600 | $448 |