Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
Portability
89
Imaging
52
Features
63
Overall
56

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Launched October 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-510
Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Introduced May 2013
  • Replaced the Olympus E-PM1
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus E-PM2, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are produced by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-500 was announced 8 years before the E-PM2 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going right into a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-500 scores vs the E-PM2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus E-PM2

 E-500 E-PM2 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus E-500

 E-PM2 E-500 
IntroducedMay 2013October 2005More recent by 92 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kCrisper display (+245k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-PM2

 E-500 E-PM2 
Focus manually More precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 features external measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM2 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus E-PM2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-500 against the E-PM2.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and E-PM2 is 70 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and E-PM2.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus E-PM2 to deliver more detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
Portrait photography with Olympus E-PM2
48
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
71
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography advice
Olympus E-PM2 Street photography advice
56
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (479 grams)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
79
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
has focus by touch
above average ISO range (25,600)
screen is fixed
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-PM2 as a Sports photography camera
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
max fps low (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography factors
Olympus E-PM2 Travel photography factors
52
lighter than competition in class (479 grams)
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
66
has focus by touch
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-500
Landscape photography with Olympus E-PM2
43
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
does not have Time Lapse function
74
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging advice
Olympus E-PM2 Vlogging advice
9
can't shoot video
36
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external microphone socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-PM2
 Olympus E-500Olympus PEN E-PM2
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-500 Olympus PEN E-PM2
Also referred to as EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2005-10-21 2013-05-21
Physical type Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 400 25600
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 35
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 45 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479g (1.06 lbs) 269g (0.59 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 72
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.2
DXO Low light score not tested 932
Other
Battery life - 360 images
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $600 $448