Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8df78/8df78639e31f6f9cab0cd6bb2ccb49100f8299fb" alt="Olympus SZ-12 front Olympus SZ-12 front"
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Announced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and SZ-12 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and SZ-12 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-500 was announced 7 years earlier than the SZ-12 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SZ-12 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-500 grades vs the SZ-12 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 & Olympus SZ-12. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Olympus SZ-12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus SZ-12
E-500 | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Olympus E-500
SZ-12 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | ![]() | October 2005 | Fresher by 75 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus SZ-12
E-500 | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has got external measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Olympus SZ-12 has proportions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-500 and the SZ-12.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f0e9/2f0e9fb137731e5971663c94dcebb0fdbd1c9b27" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and SZ-12 is 70 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac0d2/ac0d20d71db523f8f3e316ffc6e4fa76392ab8f8" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing just by going through specifications. The visual underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and SZ-12.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-500 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus SZ-12 will show more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older E-500 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60013/60013b7dc7d0acf3d1370e618b7291ea9d3caad7" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e347/0e347e63ccabeb2a07262c1d0c2a5ace3fd38ad7" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SZ-12 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus SZ-12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus SZ-12 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 215k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1700s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 lb) | 226g (0.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $600 | $350 |