Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97313/9731330fcb04886d79572856af019d157e2f820f" alt="Olympus Stylus 7030 front Olympus Stylus 7030 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 140g - 93 x 56 x 26mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju 7030
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and 7030 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and 7030 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-500 was released 5 years before the 7030 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 7030 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-500 grades against the 7030 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-500 & Olympus Stylus 7030. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Olympus 7030 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus 7030
E-500 | 7030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7030 over the Olympus E-500
7030 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | ![]() | October 2005 | Newer by 51 months |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus 7030
E-500 | 7030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 comes with physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Olympus 7030 has dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-500 versus the 7030.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4142a/4142ab7c81f33675d199fec166443f7a64400b7d" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and 7030 is 70 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1118/c1118a30372456ac3410564248557cb6701150ae" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The image below may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and 7030.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus 7030 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24e63/24e63eb9f89ea353105469e3f03775ee715d924c" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d1cd/0d1cd1eb1596cfbcd6c827adc5bc09e84912dd40" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 7030 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus Stylus 7030 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus Stylus 7030 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-500 | mju 7030 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9 and 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lbs) | 140 gr (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 93 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $600 | $179 |