Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
  • Successor is Olympus E-510
Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2010
  • Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-500 and Olympus Tough-3000, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The E-500 was introduced 5 years before the Tough-3000 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-500 scores versus the Tough-3000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus Tough-3000

 E-500 Tough-3000 
Focus manually Dial precise focus

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-500

 Tough-3000 E-500 
IntroducedJanuary 2010October 2005More modern by 51 months
Display dimensions2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kCrisper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus Tough-3000

 E-500 Tough-3000 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 features exterior measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-500 and Olympus Tough-3000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-500 vs the Tough-3000.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and Tough-3000 is 70 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and Tough-3000.

As you have seen, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-500 having a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus Tough-3000 will show more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
Portrait photography with Olympus Tough-3000
49
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview feature
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
21
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
low resolution (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography info
Olympus Tough-3000 Street photography info
57
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than others in class (479g)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography factors
Olympus Tough-3000 Sports photography factors
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
36
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
weather proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography factors
Olympus Tough-3000 Travel photography factors
52
lighter than others in class (479 grams)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
61
weather proofing
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
no Timelapse function
low resolution (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus Tough-3000 as a Landscape photography camera
43
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
lack of Timelapse mode
35
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual control
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
no Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-500
Vlogging with Olympus Tough-3000
9
lack of video recording
28
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Olympus Tough-3000
 Olympus E-500Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-500 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-500 mju Tough 3000
Category Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Introduced 2005-10-21 2010-01-07
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 400 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus distance - 2cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479g (1.06 lbs) 159g (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $600 $0