Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-500 and Olympus Tough-3000, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-500 was introduced 5 years before the Tough-3000 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-500 scores versus the Tough-3000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-500 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-500
Tough-3000 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2010 | October 2005 | More modern by 51 months | |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-500 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 features exterior measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-500 and Olympus Tough-3000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-500 vs the Tough-3000.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and Tough-3000 is 70 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and Tough-3000.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-500 having a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus Tough-3000 will show more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-500 | mju Tough 3000 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | - | 2cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 lbs) | 159g (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $600 | $0 |