Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 8000
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
- Newer Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8000
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus 8000, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and 8000 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and 8000 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-500 was launched 4 years earlier than the 8000 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-500 matches up against the 8000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 and Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus 8000
E-500 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus E-500
8000 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2009 | October 2005 | More recent by 44 months | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 215k | Clearer screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus 8000
E-500 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-500 has got outside dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Olympus 8000 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus 8000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the E-500 and the 8000.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and 8000 is 70 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements merely by going through specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and 8000.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-500 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus 8000 will show extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older E-500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
Also called | EVOLT E-500 | mju Tough 8000 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2009-07-01 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lb) | 182 gr (0.40 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $600 | $380 |