Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-860
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Updated by Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-860, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-500 was revealed 10 years prior to the TG-860 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-500 scores vs the TG-860 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus TG-860
E-500 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-500
TG-860 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | ![]() | October 2005 | More modern by 113 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-860
E-500 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 comes with outside dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Olympus TG-860 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-860 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-500 vs the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d75ee/d75ee266bcf0bad9f394a295bfaea718fbb06265" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and TG-860 is 70 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65ebb/65ebbe8519ba9c16344a71b8cc277f8beab03713" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The pic below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and TG-860.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-500 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-860 will resolve extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/062b7/062b79715de3ccfdbb85414d4a6e6b736fea1bbc" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bafdb/bafdb5fc27c78e6694c61026fcde77ea831d8683" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 pounds) | 224 grams (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $600 | $279 |