Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-870
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Updated by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-870, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact and both are manufactured by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-500 was introduced 11 years earlier than the TG-870 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-500 scores vs the TG-870 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus TG-870
E-500 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-500
TG-870 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2016 | ![]() | October 2005 | More modern by 124 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer display (+706k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-870
E-500 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 has got external measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-870 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-500 versus the TG-870.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/608f8/608f82c9093c42e5d42ce542311bd37bb74e7189" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and TG-870 is 70 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8e16/d8e16e5263018c58bad785bff3fb9d50056e144b" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by researching specifications. The picture here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and TG-870.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-500 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-870 will render more detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82228/82228448a4a3d88164cadac3ba89f4e06e604a41" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b60a/5b60a36dd7bd2294805a83e0264b8f69cdad2296" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2016-01-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lbs) | 221 gr (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $600 | $280 |