Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-310

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Olympus TG-310 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Launched October 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
  • Replacement is Olympus E-510
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Released January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-310, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and TG-310 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-500 was launched 6 years prior to the TG-310 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-500 grades vs the TG-310 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus TG-310

 E-500 TG-310 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-500

 TG-310 E-500 
ReleasedJanuary 2011October 2005More modern by 63 months
Display dimensions2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kClearer display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-310

 E-500 TG-310 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 features outside measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-310 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-500 compared to the TG-310.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and TG-310 is 70 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The image underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and TG-310.

Plainly, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-500 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus TG-310 will render greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-310
49
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview feature
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
33
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
supports face detection focusing
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography details
Olympus TG-310 Street photography details
57
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (479 grams)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
66
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than competition (155g)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography info
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography info
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
40
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
weather sealing
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (150 CIPA)
does not have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-500
Travel photography with Olympus TG-310
52
lighter than competition in class (479 grams)
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (8MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
67
lighter than competition (155g)
weather sealing
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
terrible battery power (150 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Landscape photography camera
43
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
does not have Timelapse recording
39
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
weather sealing
no manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
terrible battery power (150 per charge)
missing Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging info
Olympus TG-310 Vlogging info
9
no video recording
32
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
lighter than competition (155 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-310
 Olympus E-500Olympus TG-310
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-500 Olympus TG-310
Also called as EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Launched 2005-10-21 2011-01-06
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 400 1600
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.20 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479g (1.06 lb) 155g (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 150 shots
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $600 $0