Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Revealed October 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Later Model is Olympus E-510
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Launched February 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview

In this article, we are analyzing the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-500 was unveiled 7 years earlier than the TG-820 iHS and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-500 matches up versus the TG-820 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 E-500 TG-820 iHS 
Manual focus More exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-500

 TG-820 iHS E-500 
LaunchedFebruary 2012October 2005More recent by 76 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1030k215kSharper display (+815k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-820 iHS

 E-500 TG-820 iHS 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 features exterior dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has sizing of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-500 and the TG-820 iHS.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and TG-820 iHS is 70 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and TG-820 iHS.

Clearly, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-500 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will result in greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The older E-500 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography highlights
49
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no liveview feature
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
27
provides face detect focus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography info
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography info
57
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competition (479 grams)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Sports photography camera
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
no liveview feature
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking focus
environment proofing
max fps very slow (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (220 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-500
Travel photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
52
lighter than competition (479 grams)
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (8MP)
display is not selfie friendly
59
environment proofing
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
no Timelapse function
terrible battery life (220 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography details
43
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inches)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Time Lapse mode
38
quite wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not available
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
terrible battery life (220 CIPA)
no Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging highlights
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging highlights
9
no video shooting
33
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
no microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
 Olympus E-500Olympus TG-820 iHS
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-500 Olympus TG-820 iHS
Also called EVOLT E-500 -
Category Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Revealed 2005-10-21 2012-02-08
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VI
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 400 6400
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 215 thousand dots 1,030 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech - HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479 gr (1.06 pounds) 206 gr (0.45 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 pictures
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Retail cost $600 $500