Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Revealed October 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-500 was unveiled 7 years earlier than the TG-820 iHS and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-500 matches up versus the TG-820 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-500 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-500
TG-820 iHS | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | ![]() | October 2005 | More recent by 76 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+815k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-500 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 features exterior dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has sizing of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-500 and the TG-820 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6682e/6682e9edbc2903bddcd7535cac92870470bfbf56" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and TG-820 iHS is 70 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a38a/9a38a60a6120557f4d52b6e1c985a980a7e949a5" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and TG-820 iHS.
Clearly, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-500 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will result in greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The older E-500 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f875f/f875f6b61d0005d622f4dd63f58b2332be1faa21" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/000ad/000ad51e192c2d7fb495d3f2ac8df91f5930c55c" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Also called | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2005-10-21 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 215 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 gr (1.06 pounds) | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $600 | $500 |