Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
Photography Glossary Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
The following is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-500 was announced 7 years prior to the TG-1 iHS which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the E-500 scores versus the TG-1 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| E-500 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-500
| TG-1 iHS | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2012 |  | October 2005 | Newer by 79 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 215k | Crisper display (+395k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| E-500 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-500 features outer measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus TG-1 iHS has measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-1 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-500 against the TG-1 iHS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and TG-1 iHS is 70 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing specifications. The picture here should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and TG-1 iHS.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 using its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus TG-1 iHS will provide you with more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2012-05-08 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 215k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 479g (1.06 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $600 | $399 |