Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Launched October 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-500 was manufactured 8 years prior to the TG-2 iHS and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-500 grades versus the TG-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-500 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-500 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-500
TG-2 iHS | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2013 | ![]() | October 2005 | Fresher by 93 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 610k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper screen (+395k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-500 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 comes with outside dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has proportions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-2 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-500 compared to the TG-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/757ac/757ac6ee165c17aab54bcdbf19782a0829363242" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and TG-2 iHS is 70 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d21f/7d21f527958f0286d23fa8da8caa4c3f981b33d8" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The photograph below should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-500 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will produce more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b7a9/6b7a927eb2c0d438dec1f43ed0632a6df87f82cc" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5573/d5573c16f9a608c6939d60e0b5411f77c686b1c0" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Launched | 2005-10-21 | 2013-06-28 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 215k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $600 | $380 |