Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front
Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
42
Overall
38

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Launched October 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Replacement is Olympus E-510
Olympus TG-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
  • Released June 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-500 was manufactured 8 years prior to the TG-2 iHS and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-500 grades versus the TG-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS

 E-500 TG-2 iHS 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-500

 TG-2 iHS E-500 
ReleasedJune 2013October 2005Fresher by 93 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution610k215kSharper screen (+395k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-2 iHS

 E-500 TG-2 iHS 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 comes with outside dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has proportions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

See the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-2 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-500 compared to the TG-2 iHS.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and TG-2 iHS is 70 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The photograph below should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and TG-2 iHS.

As you can tell, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-500 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will produce more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-2 iHS Portrait photography advice
48
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
does not have liveview
MP count low (8 megapixels)
27
supports face detection focus
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-500
Street photography with Olympus TG-2 iHS
56
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lighter than others in class (479g)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-2 iHS as a Sports photography camera
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
weather sealing
great battery life (350 per charge)
slow frames per second (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography factors
Olympus TG-2 iHS Travel photography factors
52
lighter than others in class (479g)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse function
MP count low (8MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
68
great battery life (350 per charge)
weather sealing
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
doesn't have Timelapse function
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography info
Olympus TG-2 iHS Landscape photography info
43
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Timelapse function
46
decently wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
great battery life (350 per charge)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging highlights
Olympus TG-2 iHS Vlogging highlights
9
can't record video
36
decently wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not have selfie friendly display
doesn't have external microphone jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
 Olympus E-500Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-500 Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-500 -
Category Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Launched 2005-10-21 2013-06-28
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 215k dot 610k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech - OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479g (1.06 pounds) 230g (0.51 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 images
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card -
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $600 $380