Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-120
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d8a9/2d8a95487a0964a4254d1d693e044bf6a741f7bd" alt="Olympus VG-120 front Olympus VG-120 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-120 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Released October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-120 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus E-500 and Olympus VG-120, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and VG-120 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and VG-120 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-500 was brought out 6 years earlier than the VG-120 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-500 grades against the VG-120 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-120 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 & Olympus VG-120. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Olympus VG-120 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus VG-120
E-500 | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Olympus E-500
VG-120 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | October 2005 | Newer by 63 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus VG-120
E-500 | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-120 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 enjoys physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus VG-120 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-500 and Olympus VG-120 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-500 vs the VG-120.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a700/2a7007a4f173a53e45e22613771cbb5c715e51f6" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-120 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-120 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and VG-120 is 70 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e5c0/1e5c0b35c3d56414b9874801ba7c396d0b4edb3c" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-120 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-120 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-120 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by going over specifications. The image below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and VG-120.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus VG-120 will offer you greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a449/6a44926b03ef75e50e0868c7a5871f790e18cb5e" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-120 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-120 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68ff0/68ff00c713d2f9956a9c51214430d0fa3284c95f" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-120 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus VG-120 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus VG-120 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Released | 2005-10-21 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 7cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 lbs) | 120g (0.26 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 160 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $600 | $190 |