Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-160
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Revealed October 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Below is a complete review of the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus VG-160, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and VG-160 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-500 was launched 7 years before the VG-160 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-500 matches up versus the VG-160 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 and Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus VG-160
E-500 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-500
VG-160 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | ![]() | October 2005 | More recent by 75 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus VG-160
E-500 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 offers physical dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus VG-160 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-500 and the VG-160.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbf61/bbf6146e932221094dc21ece7ddadb4ffe40bb5b" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and VG-160 is 70 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f38d3/f38d3b87bd6cc99cf74e88dd05bb7950c7f46c63" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and VG-160.
Clearly, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus VG-160 will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos way more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37845/378451b2175623011cd2338e4dae211a87a9b7b5" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01b29/01b297af00c86c48236ec494b67b3557953ee545" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Olympus VG-160 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2005-10-21 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 7cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 pounds) | 125g (0.28 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 165 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $600 | $90 |