Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-320
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Updated by Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus VR-320, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-500 was unveiled 6 years prior to the VR-320 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-500 grades versus the VR-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 & Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus VR-320
E-500 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-500
VR-320 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2011 | ![]() | October 2005 | More recent by 69 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus VR-320
E-500 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 offers outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-500 and the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a142/6a1425f7b026c2b7dd5561ee5fa436461a1f08ed" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and VR-320 is 70 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d51e/8d51ed6edd1ee1e64a1e964951945a8c0134d739" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and VR-320.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-500 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus VR-320 will offer extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/882dc/882dc120431f887a2f3f83430ca0c051d5ac68b0" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39eb8/39eb87fc0a1181a4191f747bfcafb805f8ed409c" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus VR-320 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 215k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 gr (1.06 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $600 | $179 |