Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f15c/0f15c591df6691d1385fd9ef9a58f17d9653b4b3" alt="Olympus VR-340 front Olympus VR-340 front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Launched October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and VR-340 (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and VR-340 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-500 was brought out 7 years before the VR-340 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-500 grades versus the VR-340 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 and Olympus VR-340. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus VR-340
E-500 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus E-500
VR-340 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | October 2005 | Newer by 75 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus VR-340
E-500 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 offers physical dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-500 compared to the VR-340.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af1be/af1beb341159b6f99def7a80fb641a0fa46c7007" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and VR-340 is 70 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08938/08938b4a68bf17c9a122fa2b961c70e1d06f747c" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The pic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and VR-340.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus VR-340 will resolve greater detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/081ab/081ab024dc2ec4e49375a871d2afcab2388ed25e" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20967/2096702abd13eceb5964068cc6f51162466afd72" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus VR-340 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus VR-340 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2005-10-21 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-5.7 |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 215 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lb) | 125 gr (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $600 | $130 |