Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II front
Portability
55
Imaging
54
Features
82
Overall
65

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
  • Successor is Olympus E-510
Panasonic FZ1000 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
  • 808g - 136 x 97 x 132mm
  • Announced February 2019
  • Superseded the Panasonic FZ1000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Overview

Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FZ1000 II, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FZ1000 II (20MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FZ1000 II (1") have different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-500 was introduced 14 years before the FZ1000 II which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-500 grades against the FZ1000 II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FZ1000 II

 E-500 FZ1000 II 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 II over the Olympus E-500

 FZ1000 II E-500 
AnnouncedFebruary 2019October 2005Newer by 162 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1240k215kSharper screen (+1025k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ1000 II

 E-500 FZ1000 II 
Manually focus Very precise focus

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has got external dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ1000 II has proportions of 136mm x 97mm x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") along with a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FZ1000 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-500 versus the FZ1000 II.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and FZ1000 II is 70 and 55 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specs. The pic here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and FZ1000 II.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic FZ1000 II will show greater detail using its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic FZ1000 II as a Portrait photography camera
48
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no liveview feature
low MP (8MP)
72
has manual focus
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (1")
offers face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-500
Street photography with Panasonic FZ1000 II
56
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
lighter than competition (479 grams)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
71
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is nice (1")
supports RAW formats
offers touch focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography advice
Panasonic FZ1000 II Sports photography advice
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
no liveview feature
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
69
excellent zoom range (25-400mm 16.0 x zoom)
quiet shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
offers tracking focus
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography factors
Panasonic FZ1000 II Travel photography factors
52
lighter than competition (479 grams)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low MP (8 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
67
connects via bluetooth
offers touch focus
good MP (20MP)
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
fairly wide (25mm)
great reach (400mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-500
Landscape photography with Panasonic FZ1000 II
43
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
small screen (2.5 inch)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
65
has manual focus
fairly wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging information
Panasonic FZ1000 II Vlogging information
9
no video shooting
67
fairly wide (25mm)
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
includes microphone support
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ1000 II
 Olympus E-500Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-500 Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II
Also referred to as EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2005-10-21 2019-02-18
Physical type Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor - Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 400 12800
Max enhanced ISO 1600 25600
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW images
Min enhanced ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 49
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-400mm (16.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-4.0
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 2.7
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 215 thousand dots 1,240 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x 0.74x
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Max quiet shutter speed - 1/16000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 12.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 13.50 m (with Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, 1st / 2nd Slow Sync.
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution None 3840x2160
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479 grams (1.06 pounds) 808 grams (1.78 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 136 x 97 x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - DMW-BLC12PP
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported)
Card slots One One
Cost at release $600 $898