Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH10

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH10 front
Portability
97
Imaging
40
Features
26
Overall
34

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH10 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Successor is Olympus E-510
Panasonic FH10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
  • 103g - 94 x 54 x 18mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH10 Overview

Lets look closer at the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FH10, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FH10 (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FH10 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-500 was brought out 8 years prior to the FH10 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FH10 being a Compact camera.

Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-500 scores against the FH10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FH10

 E-500 FH10 
Manually focus Very exact focusing

Reasons to pick Panasonic FH10 over the Olympus E-500

 FH10 E-500 
RevealedJanuary 2013October 2005Fresher by 87 months
Screen dimension2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kCrisper screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FH10

 E-500 FH10 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH10 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 offers exterior dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH10 has sizing of 94mm x 54mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 103 grams (0.23 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FH10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-500 versus the FH10.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH10 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and FH10 is 70 and 97 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH10 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing merely by looking through specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and FH10.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-500 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FH10 will provide you with greater detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The older E-500 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH10 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography details
Panasonic FH10 Portrait photography details
49
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
does not have liveview
low MP (8MP)
30
good megapixels (16MP)
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography advice
Panasonic FH10 Street photography advice
57
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than average in class (479 grams)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
64
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (103 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography features
Panasonic FH10 Sports photography features
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
includes tracking focus
max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography features
Panasonic FH10 Travel photography features
52
lighter than average in class (479g)
has built in flash
no Timelapse function
low MP (8MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
69
lighter than competition in class (103g)
good megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (26mm)
missing Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic FH10 Landscape photography factors
43
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
no Timelapse function
39
fairly wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging advice
Panasonic FH10 Vlogging advice
9
can't shoot video
31
fairly wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (103g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FH10
 Olympus E-500Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH10
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-500 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH10
Alternate name EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2005-10-21 2013-01-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-6.9
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 215k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.40 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 gr (1.06 pounds) 103 gr (0.23 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 94 x 54 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 260 photographs
Battery format - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $600 $110