Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH20
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f214/4f2145e13d5e8faa7940ed0459e5247133b2a64c" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 front"
93 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Launched October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Updated by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 178g - 100 x 56 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH20 Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FH20, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FH20 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FH20 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-500 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the FH20 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FH20 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-500 matches up versus the FH20 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH20 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Panasonic FH20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FH20
E-500 | FH20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH20 over the Olympus E-500
FH20 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | ![]() | October 2005 | Fresher by 51 months |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FH20
E-500 | FH20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH20 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 comes with outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Panasonic FH20 has proportions of 100mm x 56mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FH20 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-500 vs the FH20.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ca30/7ca30287f20e2de2c3888b3af6a8b7181e6e0322" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH20 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH20 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and FH20 is 70 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d9a8/7d9a801aa79b75fcacf436dbed8fe84c2deffff3" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH20 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH20 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH20 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading technical specs. The visual underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and FH20.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-500 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FH20 will offer greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b27a2/b27a296bcebbf9f15e6bbaf39e46eb513322cb36" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH20 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH20 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH20 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ad7b/6ad7b6119eb90107765dbc39c2ad3b88ad62bbe6" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH20 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-500 | Lumix DMC-FS30 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2005-10-21 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 pounds) | 178g (0.39 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 100 x 56 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $600 | $179 |