Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7f2b/f7f2b938fbb5b27534c61aae91a2ae9f4e196796" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FH22, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FH22 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FH22 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-500 was announced 5 years prior to the FH22 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FH22 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-500 matches up against the FH22 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FH22
E-500 | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus E-500
FH22 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | ![]() | October 2005 | More recent by 51 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+15k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FH22
E-500 | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 offers outside measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Panasonic FH22 has dimensions of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FH22 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-500 versus the FH22.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f7a3/8f7a35820b2f61a8da3caa42034dd9d72ad2bf68" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and FH22 is 70 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7e84/e7e84af86ccca8d57cf8f6594705ea487804c543" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by going over specs. The photograph below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and FH22.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Panasonic FH22 will offer greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ac28/1ac28c384ef7e1805d21ca04801ef5e3dae769fb" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08b67/08b673929a0216465f9ba577ae7e81eed703ffdd" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-500 | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 lb) | 170 grams (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $600 | $200 |