Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front
Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
30
Overall
33

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
  • Replacement is Olympus E-510
Panasonic FH22
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
  • Revealed January 2010
  • Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS33
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview

Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FH22, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FH22 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FH22 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-500 was announced 5 years prior to the FH22 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FH22 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-500 matches up against the FH22 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FH22

 E-500 FH22 
Manually focus More accurate focus

Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus E-500

 FH22 E-500 
RevealedJanuary 2010October 2005More recent by 51 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution230k215kClearer screen (+15k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FH22

 E-500 FH22 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 offers outside measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Panasonic FH22 has dimensions of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).

See the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FH22 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-500 versus the FH22.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and FH22 is 70 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by going over specs. The photograph below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and FH22.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Panasonic FH22 will offer greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic FH22 as a Portrait photography camera
48
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
sensor resolution low (8MP)
28
good megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography factors
Panasonic FH22 Street photography factors
56
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competition (479 grams)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides touch to focus
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FH22 as a Sports photography camera
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
34
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14MP)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography information
Panasonic FH22 Travel photography information
52
lighter than competition (479 grams)
flash built-in
no Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
67
provides touch to focus
good megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-500
Landscape photography with Panasonic FH22
43
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
no liveview feature
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
no Time Lapse recording
41
decently wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging information
Panasonic FH22 Vlogging information
9
lack of video recording
30
decently wide (28mm)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FH22
 Olympus E-500Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-500 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22
Also called as EVOLT E-500 Lumix DMC-FS33
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2005-10-21 2010-01-06
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-224mm (8.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focus range - 5cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.80 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 grams (1.06 lb) 170 grams (0.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $600 $200