Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58c53/58c53fd189a0b402571d0bfc738fe9c100c02101" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 front"
94 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 152g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FH27 (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FH27 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-500 was brought out 6 years before the FH27 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FH27 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-500 scores vs the FH27 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Panasonic FH27 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FH27
E-500 | FH27 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH27 over the Olympus E-500
FH27 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | ![]() | October 2005 | Newer by 63 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FH27
E-500 | FH27 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 has exterior measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH27 has dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-500 compared to the FH27.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b74f3/b74f3af25860cf1702c666440959d317ab826735" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and FH27 is 70 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e037e/e037eb8f0cd128bd270e14e33abedd16cc306166" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading specs. The image here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and FH27.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Panasonic FH27 will deliver more detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4c96/b4c966572eb19218dfa63ec738bb12d094cc0786" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/046db/046dbe5009119dfa341af2dc15dd5a0df2bb18a1" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH27 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 |
Alternate name | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Touch Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 pounds) | 152g (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $600 | $229 |