Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH7
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cda9/6cda9a179c65497252823689b1994aa723ebb2f3" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH7 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH7 front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Revealed October 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 19mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS22
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH7 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FH7, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FH7 (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FH7 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-500 was released 6 years before the FH7 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FH7 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-500 matches up against the FH7 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH7 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH7. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Panasonic FH7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FH7
E-500 | FH7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH7 over the Olympus E-500
FH7 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | ![]() | October 2005 | Fresher by 71 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper screen (+15k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FH7
E-500 | FH7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH7 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 has got external measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Panasonic FH7 has sizing of 95mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FH7 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-500 vs the FH7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d327/8d327b295077b5e9187f3edb2a093aabe077ee15" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH7 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH7 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and FH7 is 70 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccece/ccececbe74b32b3018bd54aa67020ea95e7626ff" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH7 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH7 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH7 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing just by reviewing specs. The visual underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and FH7.
All in all, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-500 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Panasonic FH7 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69378/6937809646cbdff66724bf1323eeea3c9ef05744" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH7 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH7 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH7 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4eef6/4eef6c9886f63ee60646600eaa8db23beb6abdce" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FH7 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH7 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-500 | Lumix DMC-FS22 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2005-10-21 | 2011-09-07 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.1-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 pounds) | 126g (0.28 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 95 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $600 | $149 |