Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 II
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/376a8/376a854d97b2e287bdc42f8b91c8e24498c40056" alt="Pentax K-1 Mark II front Pentax K-1 Mark II front"
55 Imaging
77 Features
82 Overall
79
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 819200
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF4 Mount
- 1010g - 137 x 110 x 86mm
- Launched February 2018
- Superseded the Pentax K-1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 II Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-520 versus Pentax K-1 II, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and K-1 II (36MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and K-1 II (Full frame) boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-520 was introduced 10 years earlier than the K-1 II and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax K-1 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the E-520 matches up against the K-1 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 & Pentax K-1 Mark II. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Pentax K-1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Pentax K-1 II
E-520 | K-1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-1 II over the Olympus E-520
K-1 II | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | ![]() | August 2008 | More recent by 115 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3.2" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Pentax K-1 II
E-520 | K-1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 II Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 comes with outside dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-1 II has sizing of 137mm x 110mm x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") with a weight of 1010 grams (2.23 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-520 versus Pentax K-1 II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-520 vs the K-1 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cca01/cca018ab9c694eebbd4dc33058d14f2cb45ef42f" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 II size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 II size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and K-1 II is 68 and 55 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eac71/eac7103cc8afd9f20fed45e1fd480ffb3aaa1c88" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and K-1 II.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-520 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Pentax K-1 II will offer you greater detail using its extra 26MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77159/771599155882c02edd4de3b816511432936ee477" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7825/e7825a2da2d5ef7ec5a6c57166d0f39fbcfef21c" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 II Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Pentax K-1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Pentax K-1 Mark II |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2018-02-22 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | PRIME IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 36MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 7360 x 4912 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 819200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 33 |
Cross focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF4 |
Available lenses | 45 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.2 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 4.4fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/200 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 lb) | 1010 gr (2.23 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 137 x 110 x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photographs | 670 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
Card slots | One | 2 |
Cost at release | $400 | $1,737 |