Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FP8
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10548/105481727825cb9cec94d025b6a727750d258e12" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FP8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Launched October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Refreshed by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 151g - 96 x 60 x 20mm
- Revealed July 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FP8 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FP8, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FP8 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FP8 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-500 was manufactured 4 years prior to the FP8 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FP8 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-500 grades vs the FP8 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FP8 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Panasonic FP8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FP8
E-500 | FP8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP8 over the Olympus E-500
FP8 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2009 | ![]() | October 2005 | Fresher by 45 months |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FP8
E-500 | FP8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FP8 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 features outside measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP8 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FP8 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-500 versus the FP8.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cc88/2cc889ac2518db51486db0c5015dc50205e9e0b7" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FP8 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FP8 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and FP8 is 70 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a73f/5a73fbf04b0f8b77434af63d7e002d7a8f64d17b" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FP8 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FP8 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FP8 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing simply by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and FP8.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-500 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FP8 will provide greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older E-500 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c79d/8c79d5a36fa7f281578325719c189722b587570c" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FP8 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FP8 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81511/81511fcffa5ee7ca7c8dca391547856ded3a429e" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FP8 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 |
Alternate name | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2005-10-21 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1300s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lb) | 151 gr (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 96 x 60 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $600 | $300 |