Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX48
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
95 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX48 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FX40
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX48 Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX48, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FX48 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FX48 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-500 was launched 4 years before the FX48 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX48 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-500 scores versus the FX48 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX48 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-500 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Panasonic FX48 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FX48
E-500 | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Olympus E-500
FX48 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2009 | October 2005 | Newer by 39 months | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 215k | Crisper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX48
E-500 | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 2.5" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX48 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 has got outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX48 has specifications of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX48 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-500 against the FX48.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and FX48 is 70 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX48 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by checking specifications. The image below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and FX48.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic FX48 will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX48 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 |
Also called | EVOLT E-500 | Lumix DMC-FX40 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 pounds) | 150 grams (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $600 | $325 |