Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX700

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
44
Overall
39

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX700 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Announced October 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-510
Panasonic FX700
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
  • 176g - 104 x 56 x 25mm
  • Launched July 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX700 Overview

Following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FX700, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FX700 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FX700 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-500 was released 5 years earlier than the FX700 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX700 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-500 scores vs the FX700 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FX700

 E-500 FX700 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX700 over the Olympus E-500

 FX700 E-500 
LaunchedJuly 2010October 2005More modern by 57 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution230k215kSharper screen (+15k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX700

 E-500 FX700 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX700 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 features outside dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Panasonic FX700 has specifications of 104mm x 56mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FX700 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-500 compared to the FX700.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX700 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and FX700 is 70 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX700 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX700 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through specifications. The image below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and FX700.

Plainly, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-500 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic FX700 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX700 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
Portrait photography with Panasonic FX700
49
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
38
you can focus manually
MP count good (14 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography details
Panasonic FX700 Street photography details
57
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (479g)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
57
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-500
Sports photography with Panasonic FX700
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
43
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FX700 Travel photography highlights
52
lighter than competition in class (479g)
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse function
megapixel count low (8MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
65
MP count good (14MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.2)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography features
Panasonic FX700 Landscape photography features
43
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
lack of Timelapse function
49
you can focus manually
decently wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.2)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FX700 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video recording
33
decently wide (24mm)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.2)
does not posses selfie friendly display
doesn't have external mic socket
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX700 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX700
 Olympus E-500Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-500 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2005-10-21 2010-07-21
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Venus Engine FHD
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.2-5.9
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5" 3"
Display resolution 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 7.40 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - AVCHD
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 grams (1.06 lbs) 176 grams (0.39 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 104 x 56 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $600 $399