Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Released June 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX75, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FX75 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe E-500 was brought out 5 years prior to the FX75 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-500 grades vs the FX75 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FX75
| E-500 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-500
| FX75 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2010 | October 2005 | More recent by 56 months | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX75
| E-500 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 enjoys external measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has specifications of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX75 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-500 against the FX75.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and FX75 is 70 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor measurements just by going over specs. The visual below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and FX75.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FX75 will offer you greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Also Known as | EVOLT E-500 | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2010-06-01 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 479 gr (1.06 pounds) | 165 gr (0.36 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $600 | $139 |