Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
32
Overall
35

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
  • Later Model is Olympus E-510
Panasonic FX75
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
  • 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
  • Released June 2010
  • Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview

Below is a extended overview of the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX75, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FX75 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-500 was brought out 5 years prior to the FX75 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-500 grades vs the FX75 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FX75

 E-500 FX75 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-500

 FX75 E-500 
ReleasedJune 2010October 2005More recent by 56 months
Display size2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kCrisper display (+15k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX75

 E-500 FX75 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 enjoys external measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has specifications of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX75 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-500 against the FX75.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and FX75 is 70 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor measurements just by going over specs. The visual below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and FX75.

As you can plainly see, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FX75 will offer you greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic FX75 Portrait photography highlights
49
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no liveview feature
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
28
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography information
Panasonic FX75 Street photography information
57
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lighter than average (479g)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
62
image stabilization (Optical)
boasts focus by touch
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-500
Sports photography with Panasonic FX75
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
no liveview feature
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
39
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography advice
Panasonic FX75 Travel photography advice
52
lighter than average (479g)
built-in flash
no Timelapse mode
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
67
boasts focus by touch
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.2)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FX75 as a Landscape photography camera
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inches)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
no Timelapse mode
37
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual exposure not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FX75 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video recording
31
pretty wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX75
 Olympus E-500Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-500 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
Also Known as EVOLT E-500 Lumix DMC-FX70
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2005-10-21 2010-06-01
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Venus Engine HD II
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 400 6400
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.2-5.9
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 7.40 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 gr (1.06 pounds) 165 gr (0.36 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $600 $139