Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Released June 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX75, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FX75 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-500 was brought out 5 years prior to the FX75 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-500 grades vs the FX75 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FX75
| E-500 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-500
| FX75 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2010 | October 2005 | More recent by 56 months | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX75
| E-500 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 enjoys external measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has specifications of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX75 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-500 against the FX75.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and FX75 is 70 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor measurements just by going over specs. The visual below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and FX75.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FX75 will offer you greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Also Known as | EVOLT E-500 | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2010-06-01 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 479 gr (1.06 pounds) | 165 gr (0.36 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $600 | $139 |