Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX90
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Revealed October 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
- Newer Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 149g - 102 x 56 x 22mm
- Launched August 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX90 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX90, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FX90 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FX90 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-500 was released 6 years earlier than the FX90 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX90 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-500 grades against the FX90 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX90 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Panasonic FX90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FX90
| E-500 | FX90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX90 over the Olympus E-500
| FX90 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2011 | October 2005 | Fresher by 71 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 215k | Crisper display (+245k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX90
| E-500 | FX90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX90 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 has got outer measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Panasonic FX90 has dimensions of 102mm x 56mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FX90 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-500 against the FX90.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and FX90 is 70 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX90 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by checking specs. The graphic here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and FX90.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-500 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FX90 will give greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FX90 Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 |
| Alternative name | EVOLT E-500 | - |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2005-10-21 | 2011-08-26 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.90 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 479g (1.06 lbs) | 149g (0.33 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 102 x 56 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $600 | $227 |