Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Revealed October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Refreshed by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Revealed June 2014
- Updated by Panasonic FZ2500
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FZ1000 (20MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FZ1000 (1") have totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-500 was launched 9 years prior to the FZ1000 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-500 matches up vs the FZ1000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FZ1000
E-500 | FZ1000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus E-500
FZ1000 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2014 | October 2005 | More recent by 105 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 215k | Crisper display (+706k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ1000
E-500 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 has got physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 has sizing of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") having a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
See the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-500 and the FZ1000.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and FZ1000 is 70 and 55 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through specs. The visual below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and FZ1000.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-500 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FZ1000 will render more detail utilizing its extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2005-10-21 | 2014-06-12 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 pounds) | 831g (1.83 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $600 | $800 |