Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
- Updated by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Launched July 2012
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ100
- Newer Model is Panasonic FZ300
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ200, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe E-500 was announced 7 years before the FZ200 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-500 grades vs the FZ200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FZ200
E-500 | FZ200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-500
FZ200 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2012 | October 2005 | Newer by 82 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 215k | Sharper screen (+245k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ200
E-500 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 features exterior measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-500 against the FZ200.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and FZ200 is 70 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The image below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and FZ200.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FZ200 will offer more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Also called | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2012-07-18 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 215k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 13.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 lb) | 588 grams (1.30 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 540 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $600 | $499 |