Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Announced October 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Updated by Olympus E-510
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Launched July 2012
  • Superseded the Panasonic FZ100
  • Newer Model is Panasonic FZ300
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ200, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-500 was announced 7 years before the FZ200 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-500 grades vs the FZ200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FZ200

 E-500 FZ200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-500

 FZ200 E-500 
LaunchedJuly 2012October 2005Newer by 82 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k215kSharper screen (+245k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ200

 E-500 FZ200 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 features exterior measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-500 against the FZ200.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and FZ200 is 70 and 65 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The image below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and FZ200.

Clearly, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FZ200 will offer more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
Portrait photography with Panasonic FZ200
49
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
48
manual focus
high flash sync (1/4,000 seconds)
features face detection focusing
exports RAW files
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Street photography camera
57
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lighter than others in class (479g)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
57
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
very small sensor (1/2.3")
heavier than competitors in class (588g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Sports photography camera
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
46
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking autofocus
great battery power (540 shots)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-500
Travel photography with Panasonic FZ200
52
lighter than others in class (479g)
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (8MP)
display is not selfie friendly
55
great battery power (540 per charge)
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
rather wide (25mm)
great zoom (600mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (588g)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-500
Landscape photography with Panasonic FZ200
43
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
does not have Timelapse mode
48
manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
great battery power (540 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging info
Panasonic FZ200 Vlogging info
9
no video
63
rather wide (25mm)
display is selfie friendly
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
includes external mic socket
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
heavier than competitors in class (588 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus E-500Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-500 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Also called EVOLT E-500 -
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2005-10-21 2012-07-18
Physical type Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip - Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 400 3200
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,312k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec 12.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 13.50 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 grams (1.06 lb) 588 grams (1.30 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 37
DXO Color Depth score not tested 19.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.8
DXO Low light score not tested 114
Other
Battery life - 540 pictures
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $600 $499