Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ35

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front
Portability
72
Imaging
35
Features
37
Overall
35

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Revealed October 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Successor is Olympus E-510
Panasonic FZ35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
  • 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
  • Released July 2010
  • Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview

Here, we are evaluating the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ35, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FZ35 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-500 was manufactured 5 years before the FZ35 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-500 grades against the FZ35 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FZ35

 E-500 FZ35 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-500

 FZ35 E-500 
ReleasedJuly 2010October 2005Newer by 57 months
Display size2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kClearer display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ35

 E-500 FZ35 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has outer measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ35 has proportions of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") having a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ35 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-500 and the FZ35.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and FZ35 is 70 and 72 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out specifications. The picture here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and FZ35.

To sum up, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic FZ35 will produce more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
Portrait photography with Panasonic FZ35
48
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview
sensor resolution low (8MP)
41
focusing manually
features face detect focusing
saves RAW files
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography advice
Panasonic FZ35 Street photography advice
56
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competitors (479 grams)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-500
Sports photography with Panasonic FZ35
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
no liveview
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
34
great zoom range (27-486mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow frames per second (2.0 frames per second)
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-500
Travel photography with Panasonic FZ35
52
lighter than competitors (479 grams)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (8MP)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
52
built-in flash
pretty wide (27mm)
great zoom (486mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-500
Landscape photography with Panasonic FZ35
43
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
lack of Timelapse mode
41
focusing manually
pretty wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inch)
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging factors
Panasonic FZ35 Vlogging factors
9
no video
26
pretty wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ35
 Olympus E-500Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-500 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-500 Lumix DMC-FZ38
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2005-10-21 2010-07-06
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Venus Engine V
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 27-486mm (18.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-4.4
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 215k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 8.50 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 grams (1.06 lb) 397 grams (0.88 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures))
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $600 $999