Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ60
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2ce8/f2ce890f5e0965ffc876c415de580524ef50e485" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60 front"
68 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ60 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Released October 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 493g - 120 x 81 x 92mm
- Launched July 2012
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FZ62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ60 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FZ60, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FZ60 (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FZ60 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-500 was introduced 7 years prior to the FZ60 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ60 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-500 grades against the FZ60 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ60 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-500 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Panasonic FZ60 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FZ60
E-500 | FZ60 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ60 over the Olympus E-500
FZ60 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2012 | ![]() | October 2005 | Newer by 82 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ60
E-500 | FZ60 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ60 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 has physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ60 has specifications of 120mm x 81mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") with a weight of 493 grams (1.09 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FZ60 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-500 against the FZ60.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc7d8/fc7d8324f64e98be476827301319974bd10beb72" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ60 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ60 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and FZ60 is 70 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29cab/29cab76b5d22fe9a3a8338d5d3dc960ae32985fb" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ60 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ60 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ60 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specs. The picture here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and FZ60.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FZ60 will offer you greater detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96071/9607108503ecace9ea3b7dd2db57a40662e4905f" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ60 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ60 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ60 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9aca2/9aca20abb96a8b8498b203f9ea8e68acf9e17f62" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ60 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ60 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ60 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-500 | Lumix DMC-FZ62 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2005-10-21 | 2012-07-18 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 202 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 13.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 pounds) | 493 grams (1.09 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 120 x 81 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 450 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $600 | $350 |